Children, on-line learning and authentic teaching skills in primary education

    Reliability

 

 

          

 

 

Main Topics

Home
Up
Sample Issues
Enabler or Driver?
Rationales
Why Online
Class Operation
Access
Participation
More on Factors
Educational paradox
Audience
Reliability
Miscellaneous Issues
Learning Structures
Spatial Issues
Spatial Issues 2
Substance & Form

 

More information ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Early in the study (2002) the issue of reliability arose with many teachers reporting that:

  • 'The computers are unreliable' or 
  • 'You can't rely on IT' or
  • 'I have to plan each lesson on the basis that the technology will fail !!'
  • ‘Every time they change the system I have to reteach what I’ve already taught.

 

Further investigations in 2003, especially in interviews with class teachers, have revealed that this is a complex issue concerning much more than correct functioning of the technology. It is useful to consider the use of technology within teaching and learning practices.

 

What 'reliable' usually means

In a general sense most teachers use the term reliability to mean that 

  • they can rely on being able to use the technology as intended (in our practices)
  • within in the window of opportunity, that is, times & places within available attention

 

Windows of opportunity

Classroom learning is managed as a sequence of cumulative, often short, tasks. Thus any loss of opportunity can be disruptive and difficult to manage in the short-term and difficult to retrieve in the longer term. Students need to be purposefully engaged with their learning tasks almost continuously and thus classes tend to operate on the basis of very narrow windows of opportunity. Student engagement with learning tasks can be 'fragile' and particularly vulnerable to disruption. The time required to overcome a typical reliability problem tends to be greater than the duration of the window of opportunity involved.

 

Many Sources of Difficulty

There are many sources of difficulty in relation to the teacher being able to rely on effective use of the ICT (in alphabetical order - not order of importance):

  • Access & permissions: denied, unknown, lost or forgotten passwords, authority not available...
  • Auto-correct: over-riding user hopes and intentions
  • Availability: number of devices inadequate to undertake the tasks in a coherent fashion
  • Compatibility: none, partial, at a cost ( eg, in importing graphics files)
  • Configurations: class machines look & feel different from each other (screen configuration, software installed...) making it more difficult to identify things needing attention
  • Connections: slow, dropping out, cables missing...
  • Development is disruptive: new OS, new server set-ups, new versions of software installed...
  • Equipment: not connected, consumables exhausted (printer cartridges, out of paper...), components missing (laptop with floppy OR CDRom drives) ...
  • Equipment differences: most classes have a mixed bag of PCs leading to student preferences for certain machines well above others and a strong preference for using only the better ones
  • Files damaged, lost, deleted or not saved
  • Filtering: a teacher selects or prepares online resources only to discover that resources are filtered at the level associated with the child's login
  • Inappropriate file names: misnamed files (a child's story about Eric the Purple Dinosaur gets saved by Word as 'Once upon a time in a land far away there was a young boy who had a dream.doc' in My Documents by default (and no-one noticed!!)
  • Memory failure (the human kind): a the child was writing a story last Tuesday but can't remember which machine he/she was using nor what the file was saved as, nor where it was saved...
  • Permissions (see Access above)
  • Poor maintenance: insufficient disk space, flat batteries, fragmented files, lost shortcuts ...
  • Operational knowledge: don't know how to use ...
  • Software/computer mismatch: computer not powerful enough to run latest versions of software and/or hard disk overloaded (slow, freezes...)
  • Software versions: trying to use templates made with previous or incompatible versions
  • Software configurations: saving to My Documents rather than class share; incorrect language (US English by default?)
  • Technology not available: eg, equipment taken by another class, being repaired, securely locked away (and key not available) ...
  • Technology doesn't work: freezes, drivers missing or not installed, globe blown, not plugged in, component not switched on, power supply needs to be reset, battery flat ...
  • Troubleshooting: can't identify problem, don't know how to solve it, necessary assistance not readily available, uncertain about whether one should fix it ...
  • Working Knowledge inadequate; unable to operate and/or troubleshoot the equipment successfully
  • Windows of opportunity: too small (task design, groupings…), not open (preparation?), closed (unable to troubleshoot)

  • User routines not known, not followed  to prevent difficulties, inadequate training...

 

[Reliability matrix: this link provides an Excel spreadsheet that may be useful in analysing your current situation - any feedback on its usefulness or otherwise would be appreciated]

 

Compounding difficulties

It is common for two or more of the above difficulties to occur simultaneously. This makes trouble shooting more difficult and hence increases the working knowledge required. Our 'Law of working knowledge' is that 'The working knowledge required is inversely proportional to the homogeneity and reliability of the systems in use.'

 

Matching technology

Thus the issue of 'reliability' from the teachers' point of view is better understood as a matter of matching technology to purposes and practices of the users (eg, teachers and students,...). That is improving the reliability means improving the match between the technology and the practices in which it is used. There are several dimensions to this matching

  • time
  • place,
  • ICT functions
  • devices
  • interfaces
  • access
  • operational demands
  • user knowledge and understanding
  • selection
  • ...

 

So what to attend to?

In most schools it appears that equipment gets less attention the further it is located from the servers. This means that problems with classroom PCs must be reported before being addressed. The problem is more significant for peripherals.

  

Meaning of reliability: technical, organizational AND professional

Teachers and IT personnel use the word 'reliability' in somewhat different ways. Perhaps for IT personnel it means that the devices containing the technology are installed and in good working condition.  For teachers, 'reliability' relates directly to their capacity make prompt and effective use of the devices.

 

Inappropriate assignment of authority and responsibility

It is common practice for schools and their professional staff to defer to technical staff on most matters relating to technology. This is inappropriate and unfair to technical staff who are expected to achieve outcomes beyond their technical expertise.

 

Collaboration required

Most of the above difficulties involve technical, organisational and/or professional issues.  For example, software and hardware configuration may need to carried out by IT personnel, but in an consistent organised way, in order to meet the requirements of different users. This means that responsibility cannot be assigned solely to IT personnel, nor to school management, not to the professionals.  It needs to be a collaborative ongoing effort between all concerned !!

 

Three levels of  implementation

The use of ICT in teaching and learning requires implementation at three levels all of which have an impact on ‘reliability’

  • School: governance, professional learning, infrastructure & services,  capability
  • Class: teaching, learning, programs and learning outcomes
  • Activities: action, experiences, knowledge, products, insight

 

Key success factors

There are four key success factors (in order of importance) that impact substantially on teacher experience of  ‘reliability’

  • Purpose (and rationale for the use of ICT)
  • Matching technology
  • Working knowledge
  • Cost effectiveness

 

The Future - a focus on practices?

Dealing with 'reliability' is best done as a on-going collaborative activity - it involves a range of interactive practices (technical, organisational and professional).  Schools that have developed a community of practice around reliability are getting much better value from the their efforts and their use of ICT in the class programs.

This issue is currently under review. The focus is likely to  move 

  • away from attention being on the technology as the prime source of difficulty
  • to a focus on in-class practices and the way in which ICT is being prepared and incorporated into these practices.

 

Recommendations: it would appear that 

  • thoughtful configuration of machines 
  • thoughtful coordinated development 
  • establishing explicit and reliable user routines 
  • achieving increased homogeneity of provision, 

at least within a class, then across a grade or school sector and preferably across the school, would be key strategies to increase the 'reliability of the technology' for teachers and students.

 

This site is maintained by Ivan Webb  phone 03 6324 3492
© University of Tasmania